Did the Court conclude that the partial closing was a mandatory subject of bargaining?
No. The Court concluded that the harm likely to be done to an employer's need to operate freely in deciding whether to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons outweighs the incremental benefit that might be gained through the union's participation in making the decision. Thus the Court decided that a partial closing is not a mandatory subject of bargaining but rather is a permissive subject of bargaining.
You might also like to view...
When obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatements, auditors should consider the applicable legal and regulatory frameworks that apply to the entity
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
On a bank reconciliation, a deposit in transit would be added to the balance per bank
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
In order for a manager to reduce throughput time, it is necessary for the accounting system to focus on calculating units produced per direct labor hour
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A company that is leveraged is one that
A) contains debt financing. B) contains equity financing. C) has a high current ratio. D) has a high earnings per share.