What should happen if the empirical reasoning behind the research plan fails the test of non-circularity?
What will be an ideal response
Ideally, if the empirical reasoning behind the research plan fails the test of relevancy or the test of non-circularity, that should be picked up by the investigative team or project reviewers very early in the process. The research study should not move forward until those issues are addressed.
You might also like to view...
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
Arguments that are flawed because they contain ambiguities or a confusion between closely related concepts are called fallacies of ambiguity.
For Heidegger, the distinction between the ontic and the ontological is the distinction between
a. human beings and the cosmos in general. b. particular facts and the structures of human existence. c. the natural and the supernatural. d. the mind and the body.
The courts view sexual harassment as a kind of sexual discrimination
a. True b. False
Textual variants are different readings in the manuscripts of a word or phrase of the text
Indicate whether the statement is true or false