In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), SCOTUS ruled that:
a. drivers of automobiles have a reasonable expectation of privacy that protects them from the use of drug-sniffing dogs without a warrant.
b. drug-sniffing dogs can only be used if there is reasonable suspicion the driver has narcotics
c. drug-sniffing dog searches are prone to many errors and are so intimidating that officials must have probable cause to use them.
d. the use of well-trained drug-sniffing dogs to expose contraband items that would remain hidden in a routine traffic stop does not intrude on a driver's reasonable expectation of privacy, and the Fourth Amendment does not apply.
d
You might also like to view...
Crime control policies are more important to which political group?
a. liberals b. independents c. conservatives d. libertarians
The rate of HIV/AIDS is about the same in the offender population than the general population, but still presents challenges to prison and community supervision officials
a. True b. False
The Communist Party of the Philippines is willing to lay down arms and join peace talks directly with the President of the Philippines
a. True b. False
The core concept of ______ philosophy is the concept of class struggle.
a. feminist b. Marxist c. peacemaking d. left realist