In Mapp v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court held that _____.
A) evidence seized in an unlawful search was to be excluded in federal courts
B) evidence seized in an unlawful search was to be excluded in state courts
C) federal police who seized evidence in an unlawful manner were subject to criminal prosecutions
D) state police who seized evidence in an unlawful manner were subject to criminal prosecutions
B) evidence seized in an unlawful search was to be excluded in state courts
You might also like to view...
Explain the structure of the American court system
What will be an ideal response?
Restitution requires that the juvenile offender repay the __________ for his delinquent conduct
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Describe the prevalence of problem drinking in law enforcement, and list reasons that may account for it
What will be an ideal response?
Bulgaria's Muslim community has also come under scrutiny since 9/11, in particular the ____ ______ Al Wakf al Islami, which has its origins in Eindhoven in the Netherlands
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word