What are the relative advantages and disadvantages of graphic rating scales?
What will be an ideal response?
Graphic rating scales may not yield the depth of information that narrative essays or critical incidents do, but they (1) are less time consuming to develop and administer, (2) permit quantitative results to be determined, (3) promote consideration of more than one performance dimension, and (4) are standardized and, therefore, comparable across individuals. On the other hand, graphic rating scales give maximum control to the rater, thereby exercising no control over leniency, severity, central tendency, or halo. For this reason, they have been criticized. However, when simple graphic rating scales have been compared against more sophisticated forced-choice ratings, the graphic scales consistently proved just as reliable and valid (King, Hunter, & Schmidt, 1980) and were more acceptable to raters (Bernardin & Beatty, 1991).
You might also like to view...
There is a new managerial position open, and you are asked to give the name of two coworkers that you think would do well in the position based on their past performance. This is an example of ______.
A. peer nomination B. peer rating C. peer pressure D. peer ranking
If an accused cannot hire his own attorney, and the government provides counsel, that counsel will be a:
A) prosecutor. B) public prosecutor. C) public defender. D) public judge.
When both state and federal governments have the right to regulate an area, those governments have:
a. exclusive jurisdiction. b. concurrent jurisdiction. c. original jurisdiction. d. bicameral legislatures. e. None of the above
The Federal government will be able to avoid liability for any action in tort
Indicate whether the statement is true or false