Discuss the impact of maintaining that holding to the law is sufficient to fulfill one's ethical duties, and what it says about the law itself.
What will be an ideal response?
Holding that obedience to the law is sufficient to fulfill one's ethical duties begs the question of whether or not the law itself is ethical. Examples from history, Nazi Germany and apartheid in South Africa being the most obvious, demonstrate that one's ethical responsibility may run counter to the law.
On a more practical level, this question can have significant implications in a global economy in which businesses operate in countries with legal systems different from those of their home country. For instance, some countries permit discrimination on the basis of gender; but businesses that choose to adopt such practices remain ethically accountable to their stakeholders for those decisions.
You might also like to view...
Price elasticity depends upon the magnitude and direction of the contemplated price change
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The major advantage of matrix departmentalization is ______.
a. coordination b. unity of command c. decreased span of management d. flexibility
A positive listening climate includes ______.
A. taking notes B. maintaining eye contact C. leaning toward the speaker D. all of these
Choose the correct word or words in parentheses. (Who's, Whose) that man in the first row?