Explain why similar crimes committed with different levels of intent are punished differently.

What will be an ideal response?


Differing levels of intents (purposely, knowingly, recklessly, and negligently) are established to assign differing levels of moral blameworthiness. Those who commit negligent acts are deemed less blameworthy than those who commit acts with intent and deliberation. Students may provide relevant examples, such as the cases provided in the text, to illustrate each level of intent.

Criminal Justice

You might also like to view...

The Bertillon identification system includes:

a. a written description of a person. b. a person's complete criminal record. c. a photograph. d. a written description, complete measurements, and a photograph of a person.

Criminal Justice

According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, a qualified employee or applicant with a disability is an individual who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the job in question.

Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)

Criminal Justice

The question of ________ revolves around whether capital punishment is being applied evenhandedly across a jurisdiction

Fill in the blank(s) with correct word

Criminal Justice

Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)

1.John always adjusts the rearview mirror before backing out of his driveway. John’s actions can be introduced as character evidence. 2.Witnesses testified that on 2 previous occasions, they heard Bob threaten to harm the neighbors’ dog. This evidence can be introduced at Gary’s trial for killing the dog as circumstantial evidence that Bob killed the dog. 3.Gary is on trial for raping Mary. Gary’s attorney intends to offer into evidence his past sexual activity with the victim as evidence of Mary’s consent. Under the federal rape shield law, Gary’s attorney’s efforts to get this information into evidence will be successful. 4.The rape shield laws may at times conflict with the defendant’s constitutional right to confront his or her accusers.

Criminal Justice