The book warns that underestimating one's opponent in a debate or dispute can backfire. What reasons support this claim?
What will be an ideal response
One reason is that listeners can be alienated when they realize that we have not been fair or objective. A second reason is that we may become overconfident. Strong critical thinkers try not to mislead themselves. Strong critical thinkers try not to confuse defeating a straw man argument with giving due consideration to the opposition's array of worthy arguments.
You might also like to view...
According to Benally, the essence of Navajo philosophy is holism
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1.Acts shows Peter forgiving those who participated in the death of Jesus because they were unknowingly carrying out the will of God. 2.Simon Magus was the first Christian martyr when he asked Peter to buy his powers. 3.When Paul and Barnabas were evangelizing in a Roman colony in Asia Minor, they were mistaken for gods in human form. 4.Luke portrays Roman officials as enemies of Christianity who were persecuting Paul.
Whose emphasis on strength of will did James admire?
a. Epicureanism b. Christian c. Stoic d. Aristotelian
Name one of the nontraditional Christian sects. Summarize its history and key teachings. In what way is it broadening (or challenging) traditional Christianity?
What will be an ideal response?