In spite of its reauthorization in 2006, many civil libertarians express concerns about the USA Patriot Act and its ability to erode civil rights. Explain how and why this erosion of civil rights could happen
What will be an ideal response?
Although law enforcement agencies may be in favor of the Patriot Act, civil libertarians are troubled because they view the act as eroding civil rights. Some complain that there are provisions that permit the government to share information from grand jury proceedings and from criminal wiretaps with intelligence agencies. First Amendment protections may be violated because the Patriot Act authority is not limited to true terrorism investigations but covers a much broader range of activity involving reasonable political dissent. Though many critics have called for its repeal, it was reauthorized in 2006 with a slew of provisions ensuring that the act did not violate civil rights by limiting its surveillance and wiretap authorizations.
You might also like to view...
When confronted with an ethical dilemma, employees are encouraged to follow the acronym ACTION. What does the "I" stand for?
A) Initiate recourse B) Individual accountability C) Identify Impact on stakeholders D) Integrity check
A criminal conspiracy is a(n) _______ to commit an unlawful act
a. agreement between two or more persons b. attempt c. renunciation of two or more persons d. mere preparation
In U.S. v. Leon, the U.S. Supreme Court held that information five months old was stale and could not be used to establish:
a. reasonable suspicion. b. arrest probable cause. c. proof beyond a reasonable doubt. d. search probable cause.
Parents of beyond-control children have been found to be inconsistent rule setters
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false