Both competitive firms and monopolies produce at the level where marginal cost equals marginal revenue. Then, other things remaining the same, why is price lower in a competitive market than in a monopoly?
What will be an ideal response?
In both market structures, firms produce the level of output such that marginal cost equals marginal revenue. A firm in a perfectly competitive market faces a perfectly elastic demand curve. As a result, marginal revenue for a competitive firm is equal to price. Therefore when a competitive firm equates marginal revenue and marginal cost it also equates price and marginal cost. For a monopolist, however, marginal revenue is less than marginal cost. A monopolist faces a downward sloping market demand curve. As a consequence a monopolist must reduce price in order to sell an additional unit of its product. Therefore, for a monopolist, marginal revenue is less than price; the difference between price and marginal revenue is the effect of reducing price in order to sell more output. As a result, when a monopolist equates marginal revenue and marginal cost price will be greater than marginal cost (since price is greater than marginal revenue).
You might also like to view...
In a free market there are virtually no restrictions, or at best few restrictions on how factors of production can be employed
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
If income rises in the market for a normal good, will the demand curve for the normal good shift to the right or to the left?
If the multiplier is 5.25, then the MPC is
a. 0.19. b. 0.68. c. 0.81. d. 0.84.
The extent of oligopoly power in various industries can be measured by means of ______.
a. costs of production b. expected marginal costs c. concentration ratios d. profit-maximizing output