What constitutional principle did the Supreme Court address in Gilbert v. California, and how did the court rule?
What will be an ideal response?
In Gilbert v. California, the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of taking handwriting exemplars before the appointment of counsel. The Court ruled that handwriting samples are identifying physical characteristics that lie outside the protection privileges of the Fifth Amendment.
You might also like to view...
The operation of two separate and distinct court systems in the United States is referred to as:
A. a dual court system. B. checks and balances. C. separate but equal. D. judicial federalism.
Section 1983 lawsuits represent the notion of ______ liability.
A. personal B. restricted C. vicarious D. limited
Texas asserts jurisdiction over any crime committed against a resident of Texas no matter where in the United States the crime occurred
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Proper documentation of bloodstain patterns should always be a _____________ consideration of the crime scene investigator
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).