What is the importance of fire in ecosystem management? What is the cost of fire suppression for ecosystem health? What is the alternative to fire suppression?

What will be an ideal response?


For over a century, the Forest Service and other land management agencies have suppressed fire whenever and wherever it has broken out. Yet ecological research now clearly shows that many ecosystems depend on fire to maintain themselves. Certain plants have seeds that germinate only in response to fire, and researchers studying tree rings have documented that many ecosystems historically experienced fire with some frequency. Ecosystems dependent on fire are adversely affected by its suppression; open pine woodlands become cluttered with hardwood understory that ordinarily would be cleared away by fire, for instance, and animal diversity and abundance declines in such cluttered habitats. In addition, fire suppression increases the likelihood of catastrophic fires that truly do damage forests and that also destroy human property and threaten human lives. This is because fire suppression allows the buildup of years' worth of limbs, logs, sticks, and leaf litter on the forest floor—excellent kindling for a catastrophic fire. Such fuel buildup helped cause the 1988 fires in Yellowstone National Park and thousands of other fires across the continent, and it is why catastrophic fires have become more of a problem than in the past. To reduce this fuel load and improve the health and safety of forests, the Forest Service and other agencies have in recent years been burning areas of forest under carefully controlled conditions. These prescribed burning programs have worked where they have been applied, but they require so much time and effort that a relatively small amount of land has been treated. Sometimes these controlled burns can get out of control, as happened in 2000 in New Mexico. Efforts at controlled burns also have been complicated by public misunderstanding and by interference from politicians who have not taken time to understand the science behind the approach.

Environmental & Atmospheric Sciences

You might also like to view...

The Ouachita Mountains began to form in the Pennsylvanian Period. Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Environmental & Atmospheric Sciences

Which force does not have a direct effect on horizontal wind motions?

A) pressure gradient force B) frictional force C) gravitational force D) Coriolis force

Environmental & Atmospheric Sciences

In 2010, Iceland's Eyjafjallajokull volcano erupted. One of the results was that

A) devastating erosion sculpted the land into large ravines. B) most cattle and horses were killed by toxic gases. C) grasses were covered by ash and were unfit for livestock to eat. D) parasitic diseases spread quickly through livestock populations.

Environmental & Atmospheric Sciences

Sound intensity increases as it travels through seawater because of spreading, scattering, and absorption

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Environmental & Atmospheric Sciences