Which best describes the implications of the Meyer-Bahlburg (2005) study (examining genetic males raised as females) for the nature versus nurture debate as it relates to the development of gender identity?
A. Biological variables are a stronger influence than socialization.
B. Chromosomes and hormones rarely override the influence of socialization and rearing.
C. It is not possible to distinguish between biological (nature) and social (nurture) variables when studying gender identity development.
D. Nurture variables (e.g., rearing) have strong effects upon gender identity, but they can be overridden by nature variables (e.g., chromosomes and hormones).
D. Nurture variables (e.g., rearing) have strong effects upon gender identity, but they can be overridden by nature variables (e.g., chromosomes and hormones).
You might also like to view...
What prompted most of the upper South to join the Confederacy?
A) Lincoln's order for the seizure of Fort Sumter B) the failure of the Crittenden Compromise C) Lincoln calling up troops to quell the civil uprising D) Great Britain recognition of the Confederate government
Which of these is the warrior class of the Vedic social system?
A) brahmin B) vaishya C) kshatriya D) shudra
Under Reagan, the United States supplied military aid to oppose the pro-Cuban government in
a. Argentina. b. Mexico. c. Peru. d. Nicaragua.
Public school systems began in _________ and then spread to other northern states
A) Massachusetts B) New York C) Vermont D) Pennsylvania