The California court hearing this case sided with Hamidi, that no real harm was caused
to Intel, noting that traditional letters and telephone calls to employees would have been
comparable to the e-mail in terms of harm to the company.
What will be an ideal response?
The dissenters in this case,
however, argued that Intel had invested in its e-mail system to make the company more
productive and Hamidi was interfering with that. Assess these two positions using
philosophical reasoning to justify one view or the other.
You might also like to view...
What is enumerative induction?
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
It is false that some people who drive SUVs are not people insensitive to environmental concerns. Therefore, all people who drive SUVs are people insensitive to environmental concerns.
According to your text, objection is a dogmatic, authoritarian position in which the speaker claims that he or she has the absolute truth.
a. true b. false
Some Daoists argue immortality means being __________
a. released from the cycle of reincarnation b. free from the requirements of eating c. able to leave the physical realm for brief periods of time d. contained within a physical body for a finite duration