What did the U.S. Supreme Court hold in Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546 (1963)?
What will be an ideal response?
Arizona v. California represents a valid delegation. The Secretary of the Interior was delegated considerable authority over the apportionment of water from the Colorado River by the Boulder Canyon Project Act. The delegation was upheld because the statute ordered the secretary to consider various factors when deciding priority for water use. For example, he was ordered to consider river regulation, flood control, irrigation, domestic water consumption, and power production needs. The Court found that this provided the secretary with sufficient standards from which to work. If Congress had simply left the decision to the secretary's discretion, without listing the factors to be considered, the delegation would have failed.
You might also like to view...
Sam bought a house for $200,000. He spent $50,000 to add a room. He sold the house for $260,000. Sam’s adjusted basis is:
A. $200,000. B. $250,000. C. $260,000. D. $150,000.
Which of the following is often the cause of an inadvertent breach of the duty of competence?
a. Inadequate research b. Missed deadlines c. Errors in legal documents filed with the court d. All of these choices are correct
Administrative agencies that regulate hunting, fishing, workers' compensation, and banks typically are found at what level?
A) State B) City C) County D) District
Jay is a teenage entrepreneur, whose financial success makes him the sole source of economic support for his parents, who can no longer work. If a driver strikes and hits Jay, sending him to the hospital for a length recuperation, then what kind of claim would the parents seek against the driver?
a. enticement b. alienation of affection c. intentional infliction of emotional distress d. interference with an advantageous business relationship e. loss of consortium