In Chandler v. Miller, the Georgia legislature enacted a statute requiring candidates for public office to submit to drug tests. The court determined:
a. the public's interest in having drug-free political representatives outweighs the candidate's privacy rights, so the law was constitutional
b. the interest in having drug-free political officials did not constitute a special need, so the law was unconstitutional
c. although the state's interest did not constitute a special need, the symbolic need was sufficient to validate the constitutionality of the statute
d. although political officials do not operate nuclear power plants, handle or sell firearms,
or operate equipment that directly affects the public, they regulate these and other public
safety-intensive industries, so they must be held to the same standards as the regulated
industry employees, making the statute constitutional
b
You might also like to view...
In State ex rel. Steiger v. Gray, the court held that?
A. ?it could not take judicial notice of blood tests as proving paternity. B. ?tests, such as blood tests, may not be used as evidence. C. ?the hearsay rule applied. D. ?it could take judicial notice of blood tests proving paternity.
Typically, commercial bribes are made to:
a. Obtain information b. Cover up an inferior product c. Secure new business d. All of these choices are correct
All states publish an official report set
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Statements made by a criminal defendant to an attorney may not be required to be disclosed in court because of?
A. ?the privilege against self-incrimination. B. ?attorney-client privilege. C. ?the adversarial process. D. ?the right to public trial.