Discuss how habeas corpus defines/limits our judicial process for enemy combatants
What will be an ideal response?
Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 [28 U.S.C. § 2241(e)], which contained a clause stating that federal courts had no jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus claims made by alien, enemy combatants detained at military installations. On review the Supreme Court held that enemy combatants detained at military installations had the constitutional right to bring habeas corpus petitions, and as a result section 2241(e) was an unconstitutional violation of the Suspension Clause [Art. I, § 9, cl. 2],
You might also like to view...
In the case ________, circumstantial e-mail evidence was used to convict the defendant
of fraud and other charges brought against him. Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
__________ bandits go into a village, take everything they can, and then leave
Fill in the blanks with correct word
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. Nearly all gang members have a defiant individualist personality. 2. Mass incarceration has resulted in street gangs becoming more assimilated into prison gangs. 3. According to Merton, aberrant conduct may be viewed as a symptom of dissociation between culturally defined aspirations and socially structured means. 4. According to Merton, proscribed behavior becomes increasingly rare when the emphasis on the culturally induced success-goal becomes divorced from a coordinate institutional emphasis. 5. The results of the analysis suggested that collective efficacy is an important construct that can be measured reliably at the neighborhood level.
What type of crimes are crimes that require actual harm?
a. Actual b. Practical c. Statute d. Result