For the following, try to come up with an additional premise that will turn the passage into a deductively valid or an inductively strong argument. Usually this requires adding a general moral principle and, sometimes, an extra nonmoral claim as well. The idea is to guarantee that the "ought" claim follows from the "is" claim.You shouldn't have included that material on the exam. It was never mentioned in class.
What will be an ideal response?
One ought not examine students on material that has not been mentioned in class.
You might also like to view...
Adam Smith claims that the proper role of governments is to restrict and regulate the self-interested behavior of business organizations for the common good
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
When giving a consequentialist argument for affirmative action one need show only that these programs can have good consequences
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What do you consider a “reasonable chance” in this kind of situation?
What will be an ideal response?
Use the Square of Opposition to determine whether the following claim is true or false. When two categorical claims are subcontraries of each other, it is impossible for both claims to be false. True False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false