In Brigham City Utah v. Charles Stuart and Others (2006), involving police entering a home without a warrant where teenagers were partying, drinking, and officers observed an altercation occurring inside the home, the Supreme Court ruled that:
a. the officers' entry of the home without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment.
b. the officers had a right to enter without a warrant because they
feared the teens would flee from the house ifthey waited.
c. the officers had the right to enter without a warrant because they had an objectively reasonable basis forbelieving someone in the home was seriously injured or being threatened with imminent injury.
d. the officers should have called an ambulance and let the EMTs enter without a warrant.
c
You might also like to view...
As early as the 1980s, Daly and Chesney-Lind (1988) listed five aspects of feminist thought that distinguished it from the majority of criminological inquiry. Explain what these aspects are
What will be an ideal response?
Thomas Hobbes wrote:
a. On Crimes and Punishments b. The Hedonistic Calculus c. Leviathan d. The Principles of the Constitution
Discuss the objectives of ERO classifications. What are the characteristics of each element?
What will be an ideal response?
In Barker v. Wingo, the Court held that the right to a speedy trial:
A. was violated by a five-year delay. B. is a relative, not an absolute, right. C. was an absolute constitutional mandate. D. is a right of the prosecution but not the defense.