Why are some companies cast as villains in the court of public opinion while other companies, facing similar circumstances, are seen as heroes?
What will be an ideal response?
In this case study, it is obvious that Ashland was sensitive to public opinion and
how its actions were being perceived. Although Exxon took steps to deal with the
Alaskan oil spill, it came across as being uncaring and unwilling to be held
accountable for its actions. In contrast, Ashland's chief executive officer was
quick to accept responsibility for his company's failures and moved very publicly
to resolve the situation. This case underlines a public relations axiom:
Perception is reality.
You might also like to view...
The earliest type of communication model, known as the interactive communication model, functions only in one direction
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution covers free speech
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Presentation aids can be particularly useful with speeches of demonstration
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The term for the tendency of humans and other animals to lay claim to and defend a particular area is .
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).