The dissent in Herring v. U.S. (2009) argued that the exclusionary rule should apply to a search conducted pursuant to an arrest warrant that was later discovered to have been recalled months earlier because:
a. there was reason to believe that the arresting officer who conducted the search should have investigatedwhether the warrant was recalled
b. the officer did not honestly believe he was acting in good faith
c. negligent bookkeeping mistakes by law enforcement threaten individual liberty and can be deterred by theexclusionary rule
d. probable cause was required to conduct the search
c
You might also like to view...
Diplomatic immunity grants United States senators immunity from misdemeanors in the United States
a. true b. false
The direction at which a bullet struck a glass surface can be determined by the exothermic reaction of the glass
a. True b. False
What is Lifestyle Theory?
What will be an ideal response?
The Alien Registration Act of 1940 was signed into law by which of the following presidents?
a. Herbert Hoover b. Calvin Coolidge c. Franklin Delano Roosevelt d. John F. Kennedy