Under what circumstances would a law enforcement officer be justified (or not justified) in using deadly force, according to the Supreme Court language in the decision on Tennessee v. Garner?
What will be an ideal response?
A police officer may not seize an unarmed, nondangerous suspect by shooting him dead, but when the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm, either to the officer or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force. When determining probable cause in such cases, officers typically consider a series of factors, including the suspect's motivation to harm or escape, propensity for violence, current state of mind, combat experience (if known), possession of a weapon, and the location in which the encounter occurs
You might also like to view...
Granting or denying parole rests with the original sentencing judge
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Miranda warning are not necessary in cases in which three characteristics are present
1) an urgent need exists in which no other possibility abounds; 2) there is a possibility to save human life, and 3) the primary motive of the interrogator is rescue. a. True b. False
According to the text research the two main factors: __________ and protective that shape each individual's certain degree of vulnerability with respect to drug-taking behavior
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
According to the text, which of the following is not a primary reason that the antigovernment movement has grown rapidly since 2008?
a. the struggling economy b. changes in the U.S. demographics due to immigration c. the election of this country's first African American president d. the fear of terrorist attacks from abroad, similar to the September 11, 2001, attacks