How did Zwingli's interpretation of the Lord's Supper differ from that of Luther?
a. Luther held to the Catholic belief in transubstantiation.
b. Luther said that the ceremony was totally symbolic.
c. Zwingli said the ceremony was only symbolic and that no real transformation in the bread and wine occurred.
d. Luther claimed the ceremony was only symbolic and that no transformation in the bread and wine occurred.
e. Zwingli held to the belief called consubstantiation.
c
You might also like to view...
Why did Native American protesters occupy Alcatraz Island in 1969?
A. to protest the heroic treatment of George Custer B. to demand the land be returned to Native Americans C. to highlight the ineffectiveness of the Bureau of Indian Affairs D. to signal the beginning of a new American revolution
Why was most slave resistance before the late-eighteenth century generally not part of a coordinated attempt by blacks to destroy the entire institution?
A) Ideas of natural human rights and equality of all would not spread until the American Revolution. B) Most slaves could not read or write and therefore could not communicate with each other. C) Slaves were so psychologically damaged during slavery that they simply failed to resist their masters in any way. D) Slaves really didn't understand the nature of slavery and therefore could not attempt to break it down in any organized way.
Julian tried to revive paganism and reverse the trend toward Christianity
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Islam expanded rapidly in the century following what event in 632 CE?
a) the death of Muhammad b) the journey known as the Hijra c) the conversion of Egypt to Islam d) the fall of the Roman Empire