How are the general social perspectives of functionalism, social conflict, and symbolic interactionism important to the construction of criminological theory?
What will be an ideal response?
Possible answer: These perspectives as a whole remind us of the vast possibilities of the explanations of criminality. That is, no perspective is completely ‘right' and will explain all crime in a given society or given certain risk or protective factors present in an individual. Without a healthy debate of the components truly important to crime causation, modern societies would not have effective tools to criticize current crime control strategies or be able to completely understand why crime solutions fail (or why they succeed for that matter). Each perspective offers different insights as to what is important, which will be important to continued development of the field.
You might also like to view...
The mail and fraud statutes have what in common?
a. they are both state crimes b. they always involve professionals c. they both have a scheme to defraud d. only law-abiding citizens violate the laws
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
People with mental illness have higher rates of homelessness and substance abuse issues, which may make them at greater risk for victimizations.
One of the primary rationales behind the creation of the Department of Homeland Security was to:
A. consolidate border security, intelligence, and emergency response functions. B. distribute power to first-responder agencies. C. enhance the powers of the Central Intelligence Agency at the expense of the FBI. D. create greater state and local cooperation with Interpol. E. consolidate state-level police and emergency response powers.
Criminal acts, often termed "street crime" or "ordinary crime," that are the least profitable and least protected are called ______ crime
a. political b. victimless c. visible d. organized