When critiquing qualitative research, it is important to:
a. analyze the researcher's adherence to qualitative standards of investigation.
b. avoid comparison of the study with other published studies to prevent bias.
c. emphasize study strengths over weaknesses.
d. use the same approach for both qualitative and quantitative study critiques.
ANS: A
Critique of qualitative research is different from critique of quantitative research. The reviewer must understand the nuances of qualitative research to effectively evaluate the study against qualitative standards.
Comparison with other published studies is appropriate and does not necessarily bias the critique.
Because quantitative research and qualitative research are so different, different approaches to the critique of each is necessary.
Both strengths and weaknesses should be addressed equally.
You might also like to view...
On admission, a patient presents as follows: pH, 7.38; respiratory rate, 24 breaths/min, regular, pursed-lip breathing; PaO2, 66 mm Hg; heart rate, 112 beats/min, sinus tachycardia; PaCO2, 52 mm Hg; blood pressure, 110/68 mm Hg; HCO3–, 24 mEq/L;
and SpO2, 90% on O2 2 L/min nasal cannula. These gases show a. uncompensated metabolic alkalosis. b. uncompensated respiratory acidosis. c. compensated metabolic acidosis. d. compensated respiratory alkalosis.
A deficiency in acetylcholine appears to play a major role in the development of
a. Brain tumors b. Alzheimer's disease c. Parkinson's disease d. Anorexia e. None of the above
Cough suppressants are referred to as
A. antihistamines. B. mucolytics. C. expectorants. D. antitussives.
Perineal pain is common in postpartum women
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.