List three of the five guidelines for evaluating the discussion section.
What will be an ideal response?
Do the researchers clearly restate the purpose and research hypotheses or questions? Do the researchers clearly discuss the implications of the findings and how they relate to theories, others’ findings, and actual practice? If relevant, do the researchers provide alternative explanations of the results obtained when there is discrepancy with other sources or expected outcomes? Do the researchers identify potential limitations of the study and the results? Do the researchers identify possible directions for future research?
You might also like to view...
A group leader who conceptualizes potentially destructive acts in a positive way in an effort to help manipulative group members is using which one of the following skills?
a. linking b. joining c. reframing d. adjusting
Houser, suggests one of the most important guidelines or questions is to be answered is:
a. is the study conducted in an artificial setting b. do the researchers use less than perfect methods of observation c. so what, what difference will the study make for a discipline d. do the researchers use less than perfect samples
A professional's promise not to disclose information revealed during the privacy of the counselor-client relationship, except under specific mutually understood conditions is called
a. Privacy b. Privileged communication c. Confidentiality d. Justice
Of Friedman's four types of consultation styles used by consultees, which are less likely to advance the problem solving process?
a. Controller b. Problem-solver c. Reactor d. Striver