Jack unintentionally killed John. He had no intention of doing so. Originally, at common law, would he have been found guilty of murder based on these facts alone?
a. Yes, there was no mens rea requirement.
b. No, Jack did not possess a guilty mind.
c. Yes, Jack was clearly morally blameworthy.
d. No, there was no concurrence.
a. Yes, there was no mens rea requirement.
You might also like to view...
For homicide to be criminal, it must be:
a. Unjustified b. Unexcused c. Unjustified and Unexcused. d. Homicide is Always Criminal.
Which of the following is one of the two common definitions of the crime of larceny from a person?
A. The victim has proof of ownership in her or his possession when the larceny occurred. B. The property was in the immediate presence of the victim or his or her spouse. C. The property was in a secure place that belonged only to the victim. D. The victim had actual possession of the property on their person when the larceny occurred.
A car bombing in 1993 exploded under which New York Building?
a. The UN Building b. The Empire State Building c. Grand Central Station d. The World Trade Center
Which of the following would be the most important responsibility of a supervisor at the scene of an aircraft crash?
a. Protecting property against looting b. Establishing traffic control at the immediate scene c. Directing efforts in rendering aid to seriously injured persons d. Providing assistance to rescue or fire control units