Under the FRE, any statement by a party is an opposing party's statement (admissions) and can always be used in evidence against him or her.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
False
You might also like to view...
The Herrera v. Collins decision severely limited access by state defendants to federal courts, with the ruling that new evidence of innocence is no reason for a federal court to order a new state trial if constitutional grounds are lacking
a. True b. False
Strict sentences have made it easier for prisons to release inmates who have completed the majority of their sentence and imprison newer offenders
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The supervisor should be mindful that a criminal act depriving a person of a constitutional right or a death proximately resulting from police action ultimately might involve action under Section 1983 of the:
A. Supreme Court. B. States Rights Act. C. Federal Victim/Witness Act. D. Federal Civil Rights Act.
Explain the idea of safe havens for terrorism.
What will be an ideal response?