Jack purchased a computer printer. It is not protected by patent. If Jack is able to easily disassemble the printer and make a copy of the device, has he violated any trade secrets? Discuss.?
What will be an ideal response?
Jack has not violated any trade secrets. He lawfully acquired the printer, and if the product is easily reverse engineered it will not qualify for trade secret protection.?
You might also like to view...
Inadvertent disclosure always results in automatic waiver of the confidentiality of the material disclosed
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A bankruptcy estate is not a legal entity separate from the debtor, like a probate estate in the field of trusts and estates
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which statement is not a true element of the defense of defendant's real or personal property?
a. Plaintiff's intrusion on defendant's land is without permission. b. Defendant reasonably believes force must be used. c. Defendant must request plaintiff to stop the activity unless the request would be futile. d. Deadly force may be used to protect family pets.
Susan sees a man with a gasoline can, splashing gas all over her new car. She rushes out to confront the man and just as he lights a match, she shoots him. He is severely injured, but does not die. She is charged with aggravated assault. Is self-defense an option for her?
a. No, because deadly force cannot be used to defend property. b. Yes, because she did not actually kill the man, she only injured him. c. No, because she left her home to confront the man. d. Yes, because she was protecting her property.