What is the difference between the “flag” and “boost” explanations for recurring victimization?
What will be an ideal response?
The “flag” explanation for recurring victimization suggests that there is something about the victim that makes him or her vulnerable to victimization. The “boost” explanation suggests that it is the way the victim and offender behave during and after the criminal incident that determines if the victim will experience subsequent victimizations. Essentially, the “flag” explanation is about internal characteristics of the victim and the “boost” explanation is about external behaviors of the victim and offender.
You might also like to view...
There is no conclusive evidence that Megan Laws have succeeded in their stated purpose. There is no evidence that a pedophile can be cured of his or her sexual attraction to children
What are some ideas that might increase the success of preventing child molestation?
Based on the President's Task Force on Victims of Crime recommendations, prosecutors should:
a. Strongly discourage case continuances; should assume ultimate responsibility for informing the victims; and establish systems for the prompt return of victims' belongings. b. Are not recommended to use a victim/witness on-call system. c. Are not required to establish procedures to ensure victims are given an opportunity to express their views on bail decisions, continuances, plea bargains, dismissals; sentencing and restitution. d. Should not assume responsibility for informing the victims
Although there is no mention of the ________ in our Bill of Rights, it is a basic right of an arrested person to be taken before a magistrate without unnecessary delay
Fill in the blank with correct word.
______ is when individuals with very low levels of ANS arousal seek out risky or illegal experience.
a. Adrenaline rush b. Stimulus hunger c. ADHD d. Excitement