In Oregon v. Elstad, the Court addressed whether a first confession, given voluntarily before being read his Miranda rights, tainted the second confession by the defendant made after he was placed under arrest and read his Miranda rights. How did the Court answer this question?
a. Reading the suspect his Miranda rights after his arrest cured the taint of the first confession.
b. Once placed under arrest and read his Miranda rights, the officers had a duty to advise the suspect that his first confession was inadmissible.
c. The defendant was precluded from subsequently invoking his Miranda rights once he voluntarily “let the cat out of the bag.”
d. Requiring police officers to disregard the second confession would only impede the officers’ ability to combat crime and would unnecessarily burden the prosecution.
a. Reading the suspect his Miranda rights after his arrest cured the taint of the first confession.
You might also like to view...
Four common chemical methods for visualizing latent prints are iodine fuming, ninhydrin, Physical Developer, and _____ ______ _________
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Who is responsible for promulgating a national strategy regarding homeland security?
A) Department of Homeland Security ?B) Department of Defense C) White House ?D) National Security Agency
In the 1980s and 1990s, prosecutors charged dozens of drug-using pregnant women with child abuse or drug trafficking, and the term _____ became a household word
a. bumper babies b. crack kids c. crack babies d. meth mother
Domestic violence court faces a unique challenge in that it attempts to address the needs of
What will be an ideal response?