Explain the four dimensions of analyzing ethical dilemmas
Determining whether an action is ethical can be difficult. Learning to analyze a dilemma from both legal and ethical perspectives will help you find a solution that conforms to your own personal values.
a . Dimension 1: Behavior that is illegal and unethical: When considering some actions, you will reach the conclusionthat they are both illegal and unethical. The lawspecifically outlines the "black" area—those alternativesthat are clearly wrong—and your employer will expect youto become an expert in the laws that affect your particulararea . When you encounter an unfamiliar area, you mustinvestigate any possible legal implications. Frequently, your own individualsense of right and wrong will also confirm that the illegalaction is wrong for you personally. In such situations, decisions about appropriate behavior are obvious.
b. Dimension 2: Behavior that is illegal yet ethical: Occasionally, a businessperson will decide that even though a specific action is illegal, there is a justifiable reason to break the law. A better course of action would be to act within the law, possibly while lobbying for a change in the law.
c. Dimension 3: Behavior that is legal yet unethical: If you determine that a behavior is legal and complies with relevant contractual agreements and company policy, your next step is to consult your company's or profession's codeof ethics. This written document summarizes the company's or profession's standards ofethicalconduct. Some companies refer to this document as acredo. If the behavior does not violate the code of ethics, then put it to the test of your own personal integrity.
d. Dimension 4: Behavior that is both legal and ethical: Decisions in this dimension are easy to make. Such actions comply with the law, company policies, and your professional and personal codes of ethics.
You might also like to view...
Explain why "User interface is primarily an interpreter" and provide examples
What will be an ideal response?
Estate Administration. Alma Zeigler, a resident of Georgia, died in June 2001. Zeigler's will named as executor her granddaughter, Stacey Hatchett. Hatchett, who was teaching and attending graduate school in Illinois, filed a petition to probate the
will in a Georgia state court, which confirmed her as executor in January 2002. The estate's main asset was a brick, three-bedroom house in Savannah. Hatchett sold the house for $65,000, without obtaining an ap-praisal, and deposited the proceeds in her personal account. Meanwhile, Zeigler's adopted son took the furnishings from the house and placed them in storage. As of August 2003, Hatchett had not inventoried these items, did not know their location, and knew only that the son lived "somewhere in Florida." Also unaccounted for was a diamond ring that had been on Zeigler's finger at the time of her death and a van that Zeigler had owned. Rita Williams, to whom the will devised certain real property, filed a petition with the court, asking that Hatchett, who had not been in Georgia since filing the petition to probate the will, be removed as executor. What are the duties of an executor, or personal representative? Did Hatchett violate these duties? Ex-plain.
If an agent reveals confidential information about a principal to a third party, the principal's course of action is to obtain an injunction against the third party.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
The manager of a grocery store has taken a random sample of 100 customers. The average length of time it took the customers in the sample to check out was 3.1 minutes. The population standard deviation is known to be 0.5 minute. We want to test to determine whether or not the mean waiting time of all customers is significantly more than 3 minutes. At a .05 level of significance, it can be
concluded that the mean of the population is _____. a. significantly greater than 3 b. not significantly greater than 3 c. significantly less than 3 d. significantly greater than 3.18