In the 2005 case of Granholm v. Heald, the Court ruled that:
A. a state sodomy law was illegal.
B. a state law that permitted in-state, but not out-of-state, wineries to make direct sales to consumers was stricken.
C. voter IDs were unconstitutional under the equal protection clause.
D. states could regulate international cruise ships
Answer: B. a state law that permitted in-state, but not out-of-state, wineries to make direct sales to consumers was stricken.
You might also like to view...
Those who see the decline of voter turnout as a function of party organization change believe all of the following EXCEPT
A. parties originally aimed to increase mass political participation. B. parties used caucuses and conventions and fought against legal barriers to voting to increase participation. C. the nation was split by region in the late 1890s, and two-party competition decreased in many places. D. both parties became more liberal. E. citizens lost interest in politics because the parties did not respond to their needs.
What was one difference between the U.S. internment of Japanese and the internment of some Germans and Italians during World War II?
a. Japanese were detained solely on the basis of ethnicity. b. Germans and Italians were all detained on the West Coast. c. Many Germans and Italians lost their homes and property. d. Many Japanese were found to have committed disloyal acts
How have television and the rise of social media affected the relationship that the president has with the American public? Use examples where appropriate
What will be an ideal response?
Suppose a group of Christians affiliated with the Democratic party blow up a clinic as part of an effort to end abortion. Peter Sederberg would suggest we look at which aspect of the situation in order to decide of it is an act of terrorism?
a. their objective to end abortion b. their affiliation with the Democratic party c. the destruction of the clinic d. their identity as Christians