Perhaps the issue of any specific religion’s treatment of women and women’s rights should not delay us too much here
What would be the main and or supporting ideas to above statement?
The questions might rather inspire us to consider if religions just need to be updated. This will raise issues like those of Question #3 above. Again, for conservative reader of the Bible or the Koran (see I Cor 14:34; Sura 4:34) or the Laws of Manu, this might be challenging. The closing question about how one decides which bits of a religion to "update" is challenging indeed. Specific examples might ask if a religion must update its view of women's roles, but not update its views of sexual morality or consumerism or miracles.
You might also like to view...
During the Seleucid period, which of the following practices of the Jewish culture most likely conflicted with the sophisticated Greek-speaking culture called Hellenism?
A. prohibitions against work on the Sabbath B. forbidding of circumcision of the first-born male child C. interest in advances in science, medicine, and literature D. dietary restrictions that forbade eating chicken and eggs
One of the features of superstitious hypotheses is:
A) Vagueness. B) Falsifiability. C) Supernormality. D) Confirmability. E) Dubiosity.
Aurelius Augustine has been described as a colossus
indicate whether this statement is true or false
For Hobbes, the "state of nature" describes
a. human society before the rise of technology and industry. b. the animal kingdom before the emergence of the human species. c. any government that is based on the natural moral law. d. the human situation before the invention of society.