Which of the following is a natural science question?
(a) Should our state decriminalize casino gambling and off-track betting?
(b) Ought parents to permit their teenage children to gamble online?
(c) Is it morally acceptable for a wealthy family to lose thousands gambling at resort casinos?
(d) What motivates people to engage in these different forms of gambling: lottery, casino, and online?
(e) Can we design encryption and firewall systems which ensure that the state's online lottery servers will be protected from computer hacking?
e
You might also like to view...
Given the following enthymeme: Any vehicle that gets good fuel economy is environmentally friendly, and hybrid cars get good fuel economy. The statement needed to convert the enthymeme into a valid syllogism is:
A) Hybrid cars are environmentally friendly. (Conclusion) B) Some cars that get good fuel economy are not hybrids. (Premise) C) Some hybrid cars are environmentally friendly cars. (Conclusion) D) Even environmentally friendly cars cause some pollution. (Conclusion) E) Hybrid cars cause less pollution than conventional cars. (Premise)
Determine whether the following passage contains an argument; if it does, identify the main issue.TV's coverage of the Olympics was not very exciting. The anchorman was cool and detached, and, except for basketball, they never zeroed in on a single event long enough for anyone to care. Plus, there was just too much coverage. Anytime you turned on TV, there was the Olympics. It was like air-always there. And what's so exciting about air?
What will be an ideal response?
The expression "assuming that" serves as
A) a premise indicator B) a conclusion indicator? C) neither a premise nor a conclusion indicator
Briefly explain Neo-Daoism.
What will be an ideal response?