Based on its 2003 ruling on the constitutionality of affirmative action, why did the Supreme Court disapprove of strict racial quotas in educational institutions and jobs?
What will be an ideal response?
The Supreme Court ruled that race must be taken into account in an individualized and holistic way rather than in a mechanical way. But, it also declared that strict racial quotas would be mechanical, and therefore unconstitutional, as would be giving every school applicant or job applicant of a particular race a set number of points toward acceptance. On the other hand, considering a person's race along with a variety of other factors—the weight or importance of each factor being assessed individually for each case—would be constitutional.
You might also like to view...
In India, for example, much of the population lacks access to “improved sanitation facilities.” Which of the following is a related concern?
A. Women, in particular, are vulnerable to violation and violence. B. Economic modernization correlates with drops in fertility. C. Children experience low rates of diarrheal diseases. D. Girls are sometimes discouraged from attending school for economic reasons.
One of the traits linked to the process of McDonaldization is ________
a. efficiency. b. creativity. c. cultural awareness. d. privacy.
A condition in which people do not have the means to secure the most basic necessities of life is referred to as _______
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The language widely spoken by people in more nations of the world than any other is
a. Spanish. b. Chinese. c. English. d. Hindi.