Anselm’s argument may be viewed as a reductio ad absurdum argument because
a. he begins with a premise that is the opposite of what he wants to prove and shows that it leads to a contradiction.
b. contemporary philosophers consider his premises to be absurd.
c. contemporary philosophers consider his form of reasoning to be absurd.
d. it reduces all the traditional properties of God to the one property of perfectio
a. he begins with a premise that is the opposite of what he wants to prove and shows that it leads to a contradiction.
You might also like to view...
The Unmoved Mover is part of the argument from
A) Cause B) Motion C) Design D) Necessity
__________ arguments proceed from premises to necessary conclusions
a. Inductive b. Deductive c. Informal d. Universal
For the following argument, assign truth values to the letters to show the argument's invalidity (there are only two such assignments).(A & Y) ? (I v J)A & Y/? I & J
What will be an ideal response?
Aristotle wrote about money
Indicate whether the statement is true or false