A primary advantage to using a forensics package is that it has generally been validated by an external expert and used in standard practice
a. True
b. False
a
You might also like to view...
An answer gives the defendant spouse a chance to deny the allegations made against him or her in the plaintiff spouse's complaint.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Officers in Elmhurst, Illinois, are uniquely given:
a. Stun guns c. No COPPS training b. Procedure-making power d. Their own patrol vehicle
In Tennessee v. Garner (1985), SCOTUS decided that: a. police cannot shoot a fleeing suspect if the suspect poses no imminent danger
b. suspects can be engaged with deadly force if there are bystanders who could be harmed. c. lethal force can be applied against non-dangerous criminal suspects. d. lethal force is permitted against misdemeanor offenders.
The Supreme Court has banned the execution of the insane. However, the Supreme Court allowed Arkansas officials to force a convicted murderer to take drugs to make him sane enough to be executed, in Singleton v. Norris (2003). The Supreme Court also held that an inmate who becomes mentally ill while in prison could not be executed, in Ford v. Wainwright (1986). Using the Eighth Amendment's "cruel
and unusual" standard, how can you reconcile the decisions in the Arkansas case and in the Ford v. Wainwright case? In one situation, an insane person can be medicated and then put to death, while in the other situation, a person who becomes insane cannot. Beyond the Eighth Amendment, do you think there are any ethical issues raised by the Arkansas case? What will be an ideal response?