Andy Taylor is on trial for physically assaulting his 10-year old son Opie. The prosecution calls Aunt Bee, who testifies that two years ago she saw the defendant strike his nephew Danny in the head. The prosecutor also wishes to admit a certificate of conviction showing that Taylor pled guilty to the misdemeanors of assault and child endangerment in that prior case. How is the court most likely to rule?
A. Neither Aunt Bee's testimony nor the prior conviction are admissible.
B. The prior conviction is admissible, but Aunt Bee's testimony is not.
C. The prior conviction is admissible only if Taylor testifies, but Aunt Bee's testimony is not admissible under any circumstances.
D. Both Aunt Bee's testimony and the prior conviction are admissible in the case-in-chief.
Answer: A. Neither Aunt Bee's testimony nor the prior conviction are admissible.
You might also like to view...
According to the text, which of the following is a type of discretion that has been argued about in the context of abolishing police discretion?
A. sting operations and arrests B. plea bargaining C. use of informants D. mandatory sentencing systems
Imagine that you are preparing a pamphlet that explains crime rate trends on your campus. Which data sources would you use to construct this pamphlet and why? Why would any one source not be enough, or result in an accurate pamphlet?
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following members of 19th century European society did NOT contribute to the historical evolution of international and transnational policing?
a. Émigrés b. Anarchists c. Released convicts d. Political dissidents
In U.S. v. Ganias (2014), a panel decided that the Fourth Amendment bans officials from executing a warrant for the seizure of particular data on a _______________ to seize and indefinitely retain every file for use in future criminal investigations
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word