Who are the courtroom work group members?
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys are representatives from separate, independent sponsoring institutions. They are drawn together by a common task. As a result, courthouse regulars work together cooperatively on a daily basis in ways not envisioned by the formal adversary model (Jacob, 1991; Lichtenstein, 1984; Lynch & Evans, 2002; Metcalfe, 2016). Indeed, in problem-solving courts, such cooperation forms the philosophical backbone for the courts’ existence (Berman & Feinblatt, 2015; Worrall & Nugent-Borakove, 2008). To understand the extent as well as the limits of this cooperation, you need to examine why courtroom work groups form in the first place and their impact on the administration of justice. Each of the courthouse regulars is a representative of a sponsoring institution, which hires and fires them, monitors their activities, and rewards their performance. None of these actors can perform his or her tasks independently; they must work together. These interactions are critical because none of the courthouse regulars can make decisions independently; each must consider the reactions of others.
You might also like to view...
The supervisor should be mindful that a criminal act depriving a person of a constitutional right or a death proximately resulting from police action ultimately might involve action under Section 1983 of the:
A. Supreme Court. B. States Rights Act. C. Federal Victim/Witness Act. D. Federal Civil Rights Act.
Define cyberstalking and explain the legal responses to cyberstalking
What will be an ideal response?
In the third stage of Soulliere's paradigm, CAD became commonplace in police agencies
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Police reports based on individual crime incidents are
a. inadmissible evidence b. persuasive accounts c. incident-based measures d. fully operationalized