In Tierney v.Four H Land Company Limited Partnership, the court held that?
A. ?the district court was correct for not ordering specific performance because the burdens on Four H and Western outweighed the benefits to the Tierneys.
B. ?the 1998 CUP and the agreement that set forth the core requirements for reclamation of the property were not sufficiently certain and definite to describe what was required of Four H and Western.
C. ?specific performance was an appropriate remedy for Four H's and Western's breach, and the district court should have ordered it.
D. ?specific performance, as an equitable remedy, is not appropriate for a lawsuit concerning real property.
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
Organization is essential to effective legal writing, so you should have an organizational framework, such as a(n) ____, in mind before you begin writing.?
A. ?structural device B. ?outline C. ?format D. ?rule
The title search or title examination:
A. Is a guarantee or express warranty of good title B. Reveals impediments to the seller's ownership C. Reveals impediments to the buyer's ownership D. Corrects the legal description of the property
A creditor who enters into a reaffirmation agreement ________ all of its legal and equitable rights to collect the debt and pursue the debtor in satisfaction of this obligation
A) Forfeits B) Foregoes C) Surrenders D) Retains
_________ consists of the laws that govern the formation, financing, merger and acquisition, and termination of corporations, as well as the rights and duties of those who own and run corporations.?
A. ?Litigation B. ?Corporate law C. ?Real estate law D. ?Contract law