What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court decided that intrusions on the constitutionally protected privacy interests of government employees for non-investigatory, work-related purposes, as well as for investigations of work-related misconduct, should be judged by the standard of reasonableness under all the circumstances. Under this standard, both the inception and the scope of the intrusion by the employer must be reasonable. The Court determined that it could not determine whether the search of Dr. Ortega's office and the seizure of his belongings satisfied the standard of reasonableness because the parties were in dispute about the actual justification for the search, and the record was inadequate for a determination of the reasonableness of the search and seizure. The case was thus remanded to the district court.
You might also like to view...
If you are competing with several other firms in the submission of a proposal, one way to stand out from the competitors is to
A) include strong graphics on the cover. B) deliver it in person. C) use a professional delivery service. D) call later that day to ensure arrival. E) deliver the proposal over a celebratory lunch.
For consumer products, qualitative research is especially well suited to accomplish all of the following tasks except:
A) provide consumer understanding. B) describe the social and cultural context of consumer behavior. C) identify core brand equity and brands. D) assess consumer spending trends. E) what consumers really feel.
Describe aesthetics in user interface
What will be an ideal response?
Paula has noticed that the airport in her city is away from where most people live and work, and it takes a while to get there. This location was probably strategically designed to reduce
A. air pollution. B. noise pollution. C. highway traffic. D. air traffic. E. land pollution.