Explain the difference between rulemaking and adjudication
What will be an ideal response?
Rulemaking is directed at large groups or policy issues and concerns future conduct. Adjudication is directed at specific individuals (or businesses) or disputes and concerns past conduct. The goal of rulemaking is establishing a rule to deal with future conduct, whereas the goal of adjudication is the resolution of disputes. Rulemaking involves decisions based on facts and policy, while adjudication is based on adjudicative facts particular to disputes.
You might also like to view...
On August 20, Jolene signs a lease agreeing to rent an apartment from George. The lease term begins on September 1. On August 22, Jolene informs George that she doesn't want to rent the apartment after all. Is Jolene breaching the contract?
A) No, because a written lease is not a valid contract until the tenant actually moves in. B) No, because the contract did not exist until September 1. C) Yes, because the contract was in effect on August 22, even though the lease term itself didn't start until September 1. D) Yes, because a contract's effective date is always the date of signing, regardless of what the contract says.
In your own words, define what a stipulation is
What will be an ideal response?
How might a court reporter relieve some of the stress related to the job?
What will be an ideal response?
The overbreadth doctrine is a constitutional theory of due process that generally provides that the government cannot regulate or prohibit more speech than is necessary to address the identified harm
Indicate whether the statement is true or false