Jennifer wants to study motor-pursuit performance (tracking a moving light with a hand-held wand) under each of three conditions of distraction, high, medium, and low

Instead of using three separate groups of participants, she makes sure her groups are equivalent by testing the same 12 participants under all three conditions of distraction. She finds that performance is poorest in the first (high distraction) condition, better in the second (medium distraction), but best in the third (low distraction) condition. She concludes that performance is hindered by distraction. What is the problem with this interpretation?

a. her participants could have improved simply with practice over the three conditions
b. comparisons like that should only be made across separate groups of people
c. twelve participants are not enough to allow for such conclusions
d. you can't measure and compare a variable like motor pursuit performance over time


A

Political Science

You might also like to view...

Research suggests that the power structure of any particular city is static and rarely changes

Indicate whether this statement is true or false.

Political Science

Using the results of the census, __________ is responsible for redistricting congressional boundary lines

A) the Federal Election Commission B) the U.S. House of Representatives C) the president D) each state E) the U.S. Senate

Political Science

The device by which a corporation may contribute money to a political candidate is

A) through a political action committee. B) directly through the union that represents its workers. C) directly from the corporation's funds. D) through a special state tax transfer fund.

Political Science

Random sampling error is defined as the extent to which a sample statistic differs from a population parameter by ____________.

a. Chance b. Bias c. Sloppiness d. Poor research design

Political Science