Describe the steps a paralegal should take to map out a research strategy.?
What will be an ideal response?
The steps a paralegal should take to map out a research strategy are as follows:•Step 1: Identify the Issue-Analyze the facts and identify the issue(s) involved.•Step 2: Identify Secondary Sources-If unfamiliar with the topic that he or she is going to research, the paralegal should begin by doing some background research. The paralegal can choose from a variety of secondary sources, such as legal encyclopedias and treatises.Because organization is a key component of research, the paralegal should make a complete checklist so that he or she does not have to return to the same source later. The paralegal should be sure to check for updates in the pocket part of any secondary source consulted.•Step 3: Identify Primary Sources-Next, the paralegal should consult the various primary sources of law applicable to the issue at hand, such as federal and state statutes and constitutions and relevant case law. The paralegal should be sure to check the pocket parts as well, when applicable.•Step 4: Update and Verify Research Results-After finding and reading relevant cases, the paralegal will have to verify in Shepard's that they are still good law. Shepard's will also provide an additional source of case law because it includes every subsequent case that cited the case beingShepardized. As a final measure, the paralegal should use an online citator to verify that the research results are as up to date as possible.Having completed his research, the paralegal will prepare a memorandum of law to inform his or her supervisor of the findings.?
You might also like to view...
?Which of the following is the first step of partnership termination?
A. ?Liquidation B. ?Merger C. ?Dissolution D. ?Winding up
Dottie and Karl have been married for 22 years. They have one son, David Jr., age 16, who loves both of his parents, and shares many interests with his dad. They also have a daughter, Mary Beth, 10 years old who loves her dad but is closer to her mom and wants to live with her for now. David is a carpenter and makes about $30,000 to $80,000 a year doing odd jobs depending on the market. Donna is
an accountant and makes about $150,000 a year working for six prosperous clients. Over the past year in particular, Dottie and Karl have noticed that they are essentially living separate lives. They each have friends and interests, but they have no friends or interests in common. They like and respect each other and want to part amicably. They figure the quickest and least costly way to do that is to present an agreement to a judge and get a no-fault divorce. They have put together an agreement on their own that is just over one page long. The agreement is simply stated in plain English and provides that they have fully disclosed their assets and liabilities and that their property and debts have been divided in a way they find mutually agreeable. Karl gets custody of the son and keeps the marital residence; Dottie gets custody of the daughter and will be living in an apartment/office. She will keep her retirement account intact. Under the terms of the agreement, neither party is obligated to pay the other either spousal or child support now or in the future. Neither party has consulted with an attorney. Assume that the above description covers the basics of the agreement. When it is presented to the court, what do you think the court will do? Does the document appear to satisfy the characteristics of an effective agreement? Do any significant provisions appear to be missing?
Which of the following is a category of key facts?
A. Ultimate key facts B. Individual key facts C. Groups of facts D. Background facts E. All of the above F. Answers a, b, and c above G. Answers b and c above
The governing body of most condominiums is a nonprofit corporation in which each owner is entitled to one vote.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)