Why is informed consent such a tricky issue in program evaluation?
A) Participants often feel a subtle coercion to consent to an evaluation because they are receiving services through the program.
B) Most of the people served by such programs would not be legally able to give consent.
C) In general, the program evaluator could not give the participants sufficient information for informed consent without jeopardizing the validity of the evaluation.
D) All of the above
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
Which of the following stories is more likely to be over-reported by the media?
a. How health care reform legislation will work for American citizens. b. How Medicare determines medical service compensation. c. Why prescription medicine is more expensive in the United States than in Canada. d. How a man had the wrong leg amputated due to hospital error.
New policies create constituencies ripe for organization in part because
a. it is easier to mobilize people to pursue benefits they do not yet enjoy than to defend what they already have. b. no one ever mobilizes unless they have an economic interest that is directly threatened. c. people who adapt their plans to existing policies develop a stake in their continuation. d. the hope of gain is a more powerful incentive than the threat of loss.
In response to the debate over the Bill of Rights, Alexander Hamilton argued any such Bill of Rights would ______.
a. be dangerous to individual liberty b. add unnecessary restrictions on government c. violate the rights of individual states d. be a threat to national security
Which of the following is true about the Supreme Court case United States v. Lopez and the Court’s overturning of the Violence Against Women Act?
a. They have not seriously undermined the extensive authority nationalization has thrust on the federal government. b. They continue the Supreme Court’s long history of stripping away state prerogatives. c. They directly conflict with the Supreme Court’s rulings regarding the Gun Free School Zones Act. d. They suggest that the Supreme Court is seeking to remove the last semblance of state independence in federal–state relations.