The plaintiff in the Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP case referenced in the text, alleged he was fired as a retaliatory action because his finance had filed a complaint of discrimination against their mutual employer. The employer alleged he had no cause of action. How did the US. Supreme Court rule?
a. The case was dismissed because the man was not personally subjected to discrimination.
b. The case was dismissed because the man was not personally subjected to discrimination and was not married to the person discriminated against.
c. The Court ruled that the man was in the "zone of interests" and could sue for retaliation, but that his remedies were limited to reinstatement.
d. The Court ruled that the man was in the "zone of interests" and could sue for retaliation without limitation to his remedies.
d
You might also like to view...
Estimating a firm's forward looking EPS is considered to be easier than determining an appropriate price-earnings multiple to be used in a valuation process
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The Internal Revenue Code defines material participation
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
In a bottom-up estimate, the size of the individual work items is one of the factors that drives the accuracy of the estimates
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following would be classified as a long-term operational asset?
A. Trademark B. Inventory C. Notes receivable D. Accounts receivable