The following rationale is the basis of a real exception to the Miranda exclusionary rule
A. Protect public safety
B. Impeach a questioned defendant
C. Use statements to lead to further evidence
D. Allow statements from a proper interrogation following non-Mirandized questioning
A
COMMENT: A is the only collateral exception rationale where the un-Mirandized statement
itself is introduced into evidence to prove guilt
You might also like to view...
The silver-platter doctrine was ruled unconstitutional in which case?
A) Chapman v. California B) Elkins v. United States C) Rochin v. California D) United States v. Boone
Robert decides to make extra money by operating a fantasy football website where individuals can wager on the outcome of their fantasy football teams
Before starting the site, Robert checked with his attorney who told Robert that such a website did not violate the Texas gambling statute because the internet is regulated by the federal government, not the states. Three months after operating the site and making thousands of dollars, Texas Rangers arrest Robert for gambling promotion. Robert will be found not guilty of the charge due to the fact that his mistake of law was derived from legal advice from his attorney. Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Explain how the lives of ex-slaves were criminalized following the Thirteenth Amendment.
What will be an ideal response?
Which is true about public defenders? a. They represent the state against criminal defendants. b. They easily gain the trust of their clients
c. They often face a heavy caseload. d. Their interests are purely financial.