Compare and contrast inductive and deductive reasoning
What will be an ideal response?
Deductive reasoning is the process of reasoning from one or more general statements regarding what is known to reach a logically certain conclusion. Deductive reasoning is based on logical propositions. A proposition is basically an assertion, which may be either true or false. In a logical argument, premises are propositions about which arguments are made.
Inductive reasoning is the process of reasoning from specific facts or observations to reach a likely conclusion that may explain the facts. The inductive reasoner then may use that probable conclusion to attempt to predict future specific instances. The key feature distinguishing inductive from deductive reasoning is that, in inductive reasoning, we never can reach a logically certain conclusion. We only can reach a particularly well-founded or probable conclusion. With deductive reasoning, in contrast, reaching logically certain—deductively valid—conclusions is possible.
You might also like to view...
Goals should be very general and nonspecific to allow for flexibility and changing one's mind.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Technical support, while important for all technology-driven instruction, is most critical for which of the following delivery modes?
A) Mixed delivery B) Distance education C) Internet access D) Correspondence courses
Discuss the major factors to consider in assessment of young children. Include consideration of both appropriate and inappropriate practices
What will be an ideal response?
A teacher who spends time thinking back over the aspects of an instructional activity that did and didn't
work is using reflection as an evaluation technique. Indicate whether the statement is true or false