MATCHING.

Question

COLUMN 1
1. Self-incrimination
2. Bail
3. Consent once removed
4. Exigent circumstances
5. Stop and frisk
6. Evanescent evidence
7. Exclusionary rule
8. Right to Remain Silent
9. Rebuttable presumption
10. Confession

COLUMN 2
a. Evidence that will change or evaporate in a manner that will destroy its evidentiary value.
b. An exception to the warrant to search requirement which says that consent to enter given to an undercover police officer or informant transfers to others in the police force who may then enter without a warrant.
c. The act of admitting guilt to a crime.
d. The ‘fruit of the poisonous tree’ doctrine that prohibits the admission of evidence obtained illegally at a defendant’s criminal trial.
e. Situations that require urgent action, sufficient to excuse delay to get a warrant.
f. The act of giving testimony against one’s penal interest.
g. The right not to testify against their own interests when accused of a crime.
h. Police officers may briefly stop, identify, and frisk persons reasonably believed to have committed a crime during the course of an investigation.
i. Money or other guarantee posted to assure a defendant who is released form custody pending trial or appeal will appear when called or forfeit the security posted.
j. A presumption that can be overcome by presenting evidence to the contrary

Answer 1

1. f. The act of giving testimony against one’s penal interest.
2. i. Money or other guarantee posted to assure a defendant who is released form custody pending trial or appeal will appear when called or forfeit the security posted.
3. b. An exception to the warrant to search requirement which says that consent to enter given to an undercover police officer or informant transfers to others in the police force who may then enter without a warrant.
4. e. Situations that require urgent action, sufficient to excuse delay to get a warrant.
5. h. Police officers may briefly stop, identify, and frisk persons reasonably believed to have committed a crime during the course of an investigation.
6. a. Evidence that will change or evaporate in a manner that will destroy its evidentiary value.
7. d. The ‘fruit of the poisonous tree’ doctrine that prohibits the admission of evidence obtained illegally at a defendant’s criminal trial.
8. g. The right not to testify against their own interests when accused of a crime.
9. j. A presumption that can be overcome by presenting evidence to the contrary
10. c. The act of admitting guilt to a crime.